At Chandigarh University, we believe that assessment is a crucial part of the learning process—not just a measure of what you’ve learned, but a way to enhance your educational journey and prepare you for the challenges of the real world. Our innovative assessment practices are designed to align with our commitment to personalized learning, ensuring that every student can thrive and reach their full potential.
Through a variety of engaging, practical, and reflective assessment methods, we aim to equip our students with the skills, knowledge, and mindset needed for success in their chosen fields.
Continuous feedback + final evaluation
Real-world engineering applications
Documentation of student achievements
Virtual labs and simulators for real-world problem-solving
Automated grading and objective evaluation. Implementing tools like Gradescope, Turnitin AI, and Eval.ai specifically adapted for engineering coursework assessment.
Assess verbal articulation of technical understanding
Critical thinking in collaborative settings
Track progress via LMS dashboards
Traditional theory-based exams are replaced with project demonstrations and code walkthroughs. Students build and showcase working solutions, explain logic, and defend their choices—just like in the real tech world.
Each major assessment includes:
Inspired by agile development practices, we allow iterative grading: students get feedback, revise, and resubmit their work. The focus is on learning through iteration, not one-shot grading.
Instead of just grades, students graduate with a live GitHub portfolio and documented projects that reflect their learning journey. These portfolios are reviewed during placements and even help in getting internships or publishing work.
Final-year and capstone projects are co-evaluated by industry experts, alumni, or startup mentors. This adds authenticity, improves industry alignment, and helps students get career-ready feedback early.
Module wise credit earning after formal assessment and evaluation
A regular feature for blending continuity aspects with a final evaluation
Small segmented assessments to cover a part of the big assessment
Involving Senior industry and academic experts both from within and without the University.
Assessments contoured to the individual learning
Earning assessment in a group activity
Practical assessments in industry or involving industry
Co-curricular assessments
One of the oldest assessment mechanisms face-to-face
Identified competency assessment, could be personalized
Credits are awarded for each module after formal evaluation and ensuring structured academic progression of student.
Frequent evaluations throughout the program encourages the students for consistent hard-work and engagement throughout the program..
A comprehensive exam conducted at semester end, integrating continuous evaluation leads to final performance review.
Evaluation based on practical, research-oriented work aligned with industry-related problems.
Participation in such academic events supports the development of communication skills and contemporary knowledge base.
Oral examinations assess conceptual clarity, critical thinking, and articulation during face-to-face interaction with examiners.
Technology-driven evaluations adapts to individual learning styles, providing personalized and data-enriched performance feedback.
Periodic assessments to reinforce learning and test conceptual clarity.
Evaluation of analytical and research skills through subject-specific investigations.
Hands-on skill assessment followed by oral examinations to gauge understanding.
Assessment based on innovation, execution, documentation, and problem-solving in projects.
Evaluation of communication skills, content delivery, and subject knowledge.
Marks awarded for regularity, engagement, and contribution to class activities.
Formal internal exams conducted mid-semester to evaluate academic progress.
Ongoing evaluation based on assignments, practicals, and overall academic engagement.
University-level exams assessing comprehensive subject knowledge.
External practicals to evaluate technical skills and hands-on competence.
Summative assessment of final-year projects by internal and external examiners.
Evaluation of industrial exposure through report quality and viva-voce performance.
Using a combination of formative (ongoing feedback) and summative (final evaluations) assessments to ensure continuous student progress and final achievement measurement.
Incorporating peer reviews and self-assessments for group projects, enhancing self-awareness, critical thinking, and constructive feedback skills.
Evaluating students through interdisciplinary projects that integrate literature, psychology, philosophy, and cultural studies, encouraging practical application of theoretical knowledge.
Monitoring and evaluating students' participation in class discussions, seminars, and interactive sessions to assess their analytical and critical thinking skills.
Allowing students to create and maintain digital portfolios showcasing their coursework, projects, creative writing, and research, providing a holistic view of their skills.
Assessing students through role-play exercises, simulations, and scenario-based activities, especially in psychology and communication skills courses.
Evaluating students through individual and group presentations, focusing on their communication skills, content delivery, and audience engagement.
Assigning case studies in psychology, social justice, and cultural studies for students to analyze, discuss, and present solutions.
Assessing students' ability to critically review academic papers, books, or media content, and compare theories or perspectives.
Evaluating students through research papers and literature reviews, with a focus on their understanding of research methodology, critical analysis, and academic writing.
Encouraging students to analyze and compare cultural, social, and psychological phenomena across different societies, fostering global awareness.
Allowing students to submit multimedia projects, including videos, podcasts, infographics, and digital storytelling, for creative evaluation.
Conducting viva voce for research projects, case study analysis, and critical thinking evaluations, assessing students' verbal articulation of ideas.
Allowing psychology students to design, conduct, and analyze psychometric tests, gaining hands-on experience in psychological assessment.
Assessing students' ability to articulate, defend, and debate ideas in a collaborative setting, promoting critical thinking and effective communication.
Evaluating students through creative writing, poetry, storytelling, and digital media projects that reflect their understanding of human behavior and culture.
Assessing students through their involvement in community projects, evaluating their application of humanities and psychology concepts to real-world issues.
Evaluating research proposals in psychology and humanities, emphasizing research ethics, design, and scientific inquiry.
Assessing psychology students' skills in peer counseling, active listening, empathy, and problem-solving through mentorship programs.
Written tests, quizzes, assignments, case studies, and client simulations are all part of Comprehensive Continuous Assessment (CCA), which promotes regular participation, real-world application, and a deeper comprehension of the law.
Active participation in discussions, seminars, and legal presentations is used to evaluate class participation and presentation. This improves critical thinking, communication, and the capacity to clearly state and persuasively defend legal arguments.
Moot courts, mock trials, and drafting are all part of the Practical Skill-Based Evaluation, which is graded using criteria that evaluate oratory, advocacy, and legal reasoning.
Through reflective journals, supervisor assessments, and the display of applied legal knowledge, professionalism, and ethical behavior in actual legal settings, internship performance reports evaluate students' practical experience.
Formative assessment involves evaluation by quiz, assignments, and dissertations to monitor student learning while summative assessment evaluates overall achievement at the end of a course through exams or final projects.
Evaluation of student’s creativity by their appropriate applications of biological solutions against real-world problems.
It evaluates student’s ability to apply theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and ethical reasoning in real-world or lab-based scenarios. It focuses on measurable outcomes like lab proficiency, data analysis, communication, and teamwork.
The focus is to systematically document and showcase each student's academic, co-curricular, and research achievements. This provides a comprehensive record of their skills, progress, and accomplishments throughout the course.
To engage students in solving real-world biotechnology problems through interactive virtual labs and simulation tools. This enhances practical understanding and critical thinking without the constraints of physical lab settings.
To help students link real-life field data with lab-based experimentation, reinforcing conceptual clarity. It encourages a systems-thinking approach for deeper insight into complex biotechnological processes.
Implementing tools like Gradescope, Turnitin AI, and eval.ai for assessing students activity for critical thinking, remembering the lesson and application of the theoretical lectures.
Assess verbal articulation of theory, technical and understanding of the subject which further encourages spontaneous reasoning and helps evaluate clarity, confidence, and subject mastery.
Group discussions and debates develop critical thinking by encouraging students to analyze, question, and defend ideas in a collaborative environment. This enhances communication skills and promotes deeper understanding through peer interaction.
We at Chandigarh University believe that a comprehensive and quality assessment system is the way forward towards achieving academic excellence and professional competence in pharmacy education. Our student assessment system is aimed at tracking learning continuously, evaluating professional skills, and maintaining high academic standards.
We embrace a uniform pattern of ongoing student evaluation throughout the study period to maintain uniform learning and prompt identification of knowledge gaps. This supports personal development, facilitates classroom success, and augment conceptual knowledge.
Key Practices:
Our model of assessment allows us to independently and objectively measure learning in practice and theory, thus ensuring correct scientific knowledge and application.
Key Practices:
The assessment structure aligns with the graduate attributes and program-specific outcomes (PSOs) required in pharmacy education. The course outcomes are aligned with the assessment instruments in a systematic manner, allowing transparency and consistency of assessment of students' competency.
Key Practices:
For the purpose of ensuring fairness, objectivity, and academic integrity, Chandigarh University has a double appraisal mechanism comprising internal faculty members and external experts. This ensures credibility and standardization in appraisal procedures.
Key Practices:
Step into the world of excellence with our cutting-edge programs. Designed to foster innovation and technical process, our courses equip you with the skills to solve complex problems and lead advancements in technology.
Join the Futuristic Campus with Experiential Education Model to turn your dreams into Reality
A transformative learning experience that encourages critical thinking and innovation, equipping you with future-ready skills and career competence.
The power of AI is harnessed to its full potential to enhance traditional learning pedagogy for you and create a futuristic model of education.
The campus harmoniously brings together eco-friendly initiatives, energy-efficient building, and green spaces, making it a testament to sustainability.
Search
